Sentence Completion – MBA CET questions with solutions

Approach: Check each fragment as a consequence of 'With the advancement of EVs'.

Solution: I. EVs run on lithium-ion batteries, so battery demand growing rapidly — logical.
II. More EVs need charging; infrastructure expanding — logical.
III. EVs replace petrol/diesel vehicles, so fossil-fuel use in transport 'gradually' reducing — logical and measured.
All three fit — D.

Why the other options are wrong:
A: Omits valid II and III.
B: Omits valid I and III.
C: Omits valid II.
E: Omits valid I.

Cetking shortcut: Look for absolute words (all, eliminated, no longer) — none here, so all three survive.

Answer: D

Approach: Concession clause — the completion must go against the concern.

Solution: 'Despite concerns about the reliability of AI systems, ___' needs a positive outcome despite doubts.
I. AI diagnostics have improved accuracy — contrasts the concern: fits.
II. Global investment in AI has surged — progress despite doubts: fits.
III. Some AI models still require human supervision — this supports the concern, so 'despite' makes no sense: does not fit.
Answer: I and II — C.

Why the other options are wrong:
A: Leaves out valid II.
B: Leaves out valid I.
D: Includes III, which agrees with the concern.
E: III alone is the one that does not fit.

Cetking shortcut: With 'despite/although', reject any fragment that agrees with the first clause.

Answer: C

Approach: Check each fragment for factual and logical soundness.

Solution: I. Private companies launching commercial satellites — true and a direct result of advancing space technology: fits.
II. Human travel to all planets 'routinely possible' — factually false and exaggerated.
III. Exploration has 'eliminated all uncertainties' about interstellar environments — absolute and false.
Only I — A.

Why the other options are wrong:
B: II is false/exaggerated.
C: III is absolute and false.
D: Both II and III are invalid.
E: III is invalid.

Cetking shortcut: 'All', 'routinely', 'eliminated all' — absolute words knock out II and III instantly.

Answer: A

Approach: Check each fragment for realistic consequence.

Solution: I. Users 'no longer require any local hardware' — false; a device is still needed to access the cloud.
II. Businesses scale without heavy upfront infrastructure costs — the core benefit of cloud: fits.
III. Real-time collaboration across dispersed teams has become seamless — a well-known cloud benefit: fits.
Answer: II and III — D.

Why the other options are wrong:
A: I is an absolute, false claim.
B: Omits valid III.
C: Omits valid II.
E: Includes invalid I.

Cetking shortcut: 'No longer… any' = absolute word → eliminate.

Answer: D

Approach: Contrast clause — 'While' needs an opposing idea.

Solution: 'While interdisciplinary research is increasingly encouraged in academia, ___'.
I. Evaluation systems remain siloed in traditional disciplines — a genuine contrast: fits.
II. Collaboration has 'eliminated the need' for domain expertise — absolute and illogical (interdisciplinary work needs domain experts).
III. Funding has been adapted to support cross-disciplinary projects — supports the first clause; no contrast, so 'while' is misused.
Only I — A.

Why the other options are wrong:
B: III does not contrast with the opening clause.
C: Includes III.
D: II is absolute; III gives no contrast.
E: II and III do not fit.

Cetking shortcut: Read 'while' here as 'although' — keep only the fragment that pushes back.

Answer: A

Approach: The blank must follow 'nature of retirement' and stay on that idea.

Solution: I — 'be it voluntary or after reaching the age of superannuation, among others' lists the kinds of retirement. ✔
II — 'i.e. it should be natural retirement only and not voluntary retirement' specifies the nature of retirement that counts; it attaches grammatically through 'i.e.' and stays on topic. ✔
III — 'the amount of hard work put by others during the career' is about other people's work, which is illogical in a rule on an employee's pension. ✘
So I and II.

Why the other options are wrong:
A, B, D, E — each includes III, which is illogical ('others').

Cetking shortcut: Spot the fragment that drifts off topic (III) — every option containing it is out, leaving only C.

Answer: C

Approach: 'No matter how much…' is a concessive structure: the second half must hold true in spite of the first.

Solution: I — 'No matter how much we mitigate, there prevails some information asymmetry which makes some amount of climate change unavoidable.' However much we mitigate, some change remains — a proper contrast. ✔
II — 'No matter how much we understand him, we will fully grasp…' — illogical; the structure needs 'we will never fully grasp'. ✘
III — 'No matter how much we care for her, it will not be in vain' — the result does not contrast with caring more, so the concession is meaningless. ✘
Only I.

Why the other options are wrong:
B, D, E — include II, which reverses the logic.
C — III is grammatical but gives no concessive contrast.

Cetking shortcut: Test with 'Even if we X a lot, still Y' — only the fragment that makes sense this way is right.

Answer: A

Approach: Both words in the pair must match the positive context ('praised', 'revolutionizing').

Solution: II — 'exceptional and ground-breaking' — both positive. ✔
I — 'absurd' is negative. ✘
III — 'intentional' is neutral and 'heart-breaking' is negative. ✘

Why the other options are wrong:
A, E — include I ('absurd').
C, D — include III ('heart-breaking').

Answer: B

Approach: Join each opening with the ending that completes it grammatically and logically.

Solution: A + E: 'The person behind the fake account disguised himself as hospital staff and did not disclose that he was a consultant.' ✔
B + F: 'It is impossible to sleep with all this commotion going on.' ✔
C + D: 'In spite of the ruckus going on in her family, she managed to study and score good marks.' ✔
All three pairs work: A-E, B-F, C-D.

Why the other options are wrong:
A, C, D, E — each leaves out at least one valid pair.

Answer: B

With introduces the accompanying circumstance through the noun-plus-participle phrase. Despite expresses concession, and owing to expresses cause. Both are excluded by the stated meaning requirement. Only III satisfies it.

Answer: B

Lacking and because it lacked both preserve the stated absence of funding and mentorship as the reason for failure. In spite of adequate funding and strategic mentorship would assert their presence, contradicting the context. I and III are correct.

Answer: C

Accompanied by describes developments occurring alongside expansion; marked by describes a characteristic of that period. Responsible for asserts causation, which the instruction explicitly excludes. I and III satisfy both grammar and the required meaning.

Answer: C

Solution: Year by year is correctly formed. The other expressions contain number or preposition errors: the standard forms are year after year, from year to year, with each passing year and every year.

Answer: D