CETKING CONTENT UNIVERSES
Master Architecture & Memory for Claude
Version: 2.0 — 8 October 2026
System: Cetking Questions Universe + G Strategy Universe + Mocky Universe
Scope: Quantitative Aptitude, Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension, and Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning
1. PURPOSE OF THIS MEMORY
You are helping build, maintain and extend Cetking's examination-content ecosystem.
This document is the authoritative working context for three academic areas:
- Quant Universe
- Verbal Universe
- Logic / DILR Universe
These areas operate within the wider Cetking architecture.
The core rule:
Every question belongs to Questions Universe. Every solving shortcut or branded method belongs to G Strategy Universe. Every student attempt and performance result belongs to Mocky Universe.
Do not create disconnected question banks for the same questions.
Wider Cetking architecture
| Universe | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Student Universe | Permanent ID, personal profile, education |
| Questions Universe | Questions, taxonomy, difficulty, answers, explanations |
| G Strategy Universe | Cetking's branded shortcuts, methods and solving approaches |
| Mocky Universe | Tests, CAT mocks, drills, Arena, Fights, Combat, scores, Pulse |
| Admissions Universe | Exams, colleges, cutoffs, dates, applications, GDPI |
| Backoffice Universe | Staff, faculty, centres, operations, CRM |
| Cetking Bank | Coins, rewards, wallets, transaction ledgers |
| Rav Singh AI | Personalized conversational intelligence and controlled actions |
Do not rename database tables merely because the conceptual Universe name has changed.
2. CORE QUESTION ARCHITECTURE
Cetking has three major content layers.
Layer A — Normal / Foundation Questions
These questions primarily develop one concept.
Examples:
- Averages → Find Missing Value
- Geometry → Circles → Chords
- Algebra → Linear Equations
- DILR → Matrix Puzzles
They are taught and tested under the standard taxonomy.
Layer B — G Strategy Questions
These are questions with an identifiable Cetking branded solving method, shortcut or smart technique.
A question can have:
- Normal solution
- G Strategy shortcut solution
- More than one suitable G Strategy
G Strategy does not replace the normal mathematical or logical solution.
Layer C — 3D CAT Questions
These are CAT-level questions, especially historical CAT PYQs, involving multiple concepts.
Example:
Coordinate Geometry + Area + Algebra
They must not be forced into one normal topic classification.
A 3D question has:
- Its own historical/catalog identity
- A primary visible topic
- Multiple linked concepts
- Optional G Strategy references
- Normal and shortcut solutions where applicable
Fundamental distinction
Normal Questions = Concept Mastery
G Strategy Questions = Method Mastery
3D CAT Questions = Integrated Application Mastery
These are overlapping characteristics, not necessarily mutually exclusive database categories.
3. PERMANENT QUESTION IDENTITY
Use separate identifiers for:
Canonical Question ID
The permanent identity of a question in public.question_bank.
Example:
Q-1025
PYQ Historical ID
Identifies an appearance in a particular examination, year, slot and section.
Example:
CAT-2025-S1-QA-001
The original spreadsheet serial number may not equal the original examination question number. Preserve source sequence and verified exam question number separately.
Concept ID
Links a question to one or more approved core concepts.
G Strategy ID
Links a question to one or more approved G Strategy methods.
Test/Assessment ID
Represents a Mocky test or assessment into which the question is placed.
Never duplicate the canonical question merely to show it in another test, book, chapter, PYQ page or mock. Published test records can hold controlled snapshots.
4. STANDARD TAXONOMY
Normal question structure:
Section → Sub Section → Topic → Sub Topic → Core Type
The detailed core-type ID is especially important in Quant.
Example:
Quant → Arithmetic → Averages → Combined Average → Weighted Group Average
Another example:
Logic → Arrangements → Matrix based Puzzles → Single Matrix Puzzles
A question can also carry:
- Difficulty
- Difficulty DNA
- Strategy family
- Source exam/year/slot
- Normal solution
- G Strategy solution
- Media
- Review status
- Publishing status
For 3D questions, use a separate catalog/index and concept-linking table rather than squeezing every linked concept into one sub_topic_name.
5. QUANT UNIVERSE
5.1 Historical CAT Quant inventory
Source:
CAT Master Planning sheet 2.0.xlsx → QAall
Historical coverage:
CAT 2021–2025
330 questions = 66 per year
The original QAall source contains nine columns:
| Original field | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Year | CAT year |
| Sr | Source serial number |
| Slot | CAT slot |
| Section | Quant |
| G Strategy | Original shortcut classification |
| Sub Section | Broad Quant academic classification |
| Question full | Question stem/headline |
| Topic | Primary source topic |
| Sub Topics | Primary source subtopic |
Keep every original field, even where normalized values are also stored.
5.2 Quant CAT sub-sections
These six labels are the frozen broad CAT PYQ analysis categories.
| CAT Sub Section | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | Total | Historical share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic | 19 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 15 | 87 | 26% |
| Modern Maths | 16 | 14 | 14 | 19 | 15 | 78 | 24% |
| Algebra | 11 | 12 | 13 | 9 | 14 | 59 | 18% |
| Geo Mensu | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 45 | 14% |
| TS&W | 9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 37 | 11% |
| Numbers | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 24 | 7% |
| Total | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 66 | 330 | 100% |
These are historical analysis categories, not necessarily the exact official CAT syllabus taxonomy.
Sample topics within the six sections
Arithmetic
- Profit & Loss
- Averages
- Mixtures
- Percentages
- Ratios
Modern Maths
- Inequality
- Progression
- Logarithm
- Permutation & Combination
- Functions
Algebra
- Linear Equations
- Quadratic Equations
- Polynomials
- Algebraic Expressions
Geo Mensu
- Geometry
- Mensuration
- Coordinate Geometry
- Trigonometry
TS&W
- Time, Speed & Distance
- Time & Work
- Boats, Trains and related applications
Numbers
- Divisibility
- Remainders
- Number of Solutions
- LCM/HCF
- Factors
Do not assume this short list captures every value in the master taxonomy.
6. QUANT G STRATEGY
G Strategy is Cetking's official brand for solving shortcuts and smart methods.
Historical CAT 2021–2025 classification:
| Source G Strategy label | Questions | Share | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breakup G Strategy | 99 | 30% | Tagged |
| Visual G Strategy | 42 | 13% | Tagged |
| X Maro G Strategy | 24 | 7% | Tagged |
| Vedic G Strategy | 12 | 4% | Tagged |
| Shortcuts topic wise | 56 | 17% | Pending exact strategy classification |
| Concepts No Shortcut | 97 | 29% | Normal conceptual solution |
| Total | 330 | 100% |
Critical rule: Concepts No Shortcut
Concepts No Shortcut is not a G Strategy.
It means:
Use the normal conceptual method to solve the question.
Use:
g_strategy_status = no_shortcut
g_strategy_id = NULL
Do not create a branded shortcut for this category.
Shortcuts topic wise
This is a placeholder/classification indicating topic-specific shortcuts.
It is not yet a final canonical strategy identity.
Use:
g_strategy_status = pending_review
Naming rules
Always use:
- Breakup G Strategy
- Visual G Strategy
- X Maro G Strategy
- Vedic G Strategy
Never use "X Marco." Normalize X maro and X Maro to X Maro.
7. QUANT 3D QUESTION ARCHITECTURE
CAT questions may combine:
- Inequality
- Area
- Coordinate Geometry
- Algebra
- Ratios
- Number Theory
- Functions
One question may use several of these simultaneously.
Recommended concept structure
| Field | Example |
|---|---|
| Question type | 3D CAT PYQ |
| Primary topic | Coordinate Geometry |
| Primary subtopic | Area |
| Linked concept 1 | Lines |
| Linked concept 2 | Algebra |
| Linked concept 3 | Inequality |
| G Strategy | Visual G Strategy |
| Source | CAT 2025 Slot 1 |
The source spreadsheet Topic/Sub Topics should initially serve as primary visible tags.
Additional concepts should be attached through relational links and verified against the full question.
CAT PYQ identification
When a new question is received:
- Normalize formatting.
- Compare original numerical values and variables.
- Search historical source stems.
- Search year/slot and distinctive expressions.
- Identify candidate matches.
- Compare full conditions, options, diagrams and answer.
- If exact, link to the existing PYQ.
- If similar but modified, mark as a derivative/variant.
- If uncertain, send to review.
- If new, create a fresh canonical question identity.
Do not auto-label a merely similar question as a verbatim CAT PYQ.
8. VERBAL UNIVERSE
8.1 Source database
Historical coverage:
CAT 2019–2025
506 question records
Original source columns:
- Year
- Slot
- RC/NON
- Passage
- Essay Sub Type
- Essay Type
- Reading Ease
- Full Question
- Direct / Indirect
- G Strategy Question
- RC / CR
- Except
- G Strategy Type of Mistake
Preserve original labels and spelling in raw source data.
8.2 Historical RC / Non-RC distribution
| Section | Questions | Share |
|---|---|---|
| RC | 342 | 67.59% |
| Non RC | 164 | 32.41% |
| Total | 506 | 100% |
Historical annual totals
| Year | Questions |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 68 |
| 2020 | 78 |
| 2021 | 72 |
| 2022 | 72 |
| 2023 | 72 |
| 2024 | 72 |
| 2025 | 72 |
| Total | 506 |
9. FOUR CETKING VERBAL G STRATEGY SECTIONS
These are the four promoted student-facing categories.
The exact names are:
- Summary
- Paragraph
- Evidence
- Critical Reasoning
Do not rename Evidence back to Direct RC or Passage Evidence in the UI.
The internal code can remain PASSAGE_EVIDENCE for compatibility.
Section mapping
| CAT Sub Section | Cetking Section | G Strategy Question |
|---|---|---|
| Non RC | Summary | Summary |
| Non RC | Paragraph | Odd Man Out |
| Non RC | Paragraph | Jumbled |
| Non RC | Paragraph | Completion |
| RC | Evidence | Why Mention This |
| RC | Critical Reasoning | Inference |
| RC | Critical Reasoning | Weakening Strengthening |
| RC | Critical Reasoning | Cause Effect Reasoning |
| RC | Evidence | Truth Facts |
| RC | Summary | TSPM |
| RC | Critical Reasoning | Similarity |
Do not add Ques or Percentage columns to this clean classification table.
Question counts and percentages belong in separate summary tables.
Summary
Includes:
- Summary
- TSPM
TSPM represents the Cetking main-idea/passage-summary approach. Preserve the exact source label TSPM; do not expand it into an invented acronym.
Paragraph
Includes:
- Odd Man Out
- Jumbled
- Completion
Evidence
Previously called Direct RC / Passage Evidence.
Includes:
- Why Mention This
- Truth Facts
The label highlights directly text-supported reasoning and evidence from the passage.
Critical Reasoning
Includes:
- Inference
- Weakening Strengthening
- Cause Effect Reasoning
- Similarity
10. VERBAL G STRATEGY QUESTION FREQUENCY
Historical CAT 2019–2025:
| G Strategy Question | Count | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Inference | 98 | 19.37% |
| Why Mention This | 57 | 11.26% |
| Summary | 54 | 10.67% |
| Truth Facts | 53 | 10.47% |
| Jumbled | 47 | 9.29% |
| TSPM | 44 | 8.70% |
| Cause Effect Reasoning | 44 | 8.70% |
| Odd Man Out | 36 | 7.11% |
| Weakening Strengthening | 34 | 6.72% |
| Completion | 27 | 5.34% |
| Similarity | 12 | 2.37% |
| Total | 506 | 100% |
Reading Ease
Source labels and counts:
| Reading Ease | Questions |
|---|---|
| Easy | 75 |
| Medium | 106 |
| Moderate | 173 |
| Hard | 152 |
Keep Medium and Moderate distinct in original source data. They may be normalized later through an explicit mapping, but must not be silently combined.
Verbal mistake taxonomy
Important mistake types include:
- Opposites
- Opposite of Passage
- Out of Scope
- Distorted Facts
- Partial Reasoning
- Example/Analogy Confusion
- Scope Mismatch
- Extremist Language
- Lack of Context
- Omitting Societal Impact
- Logical Reversal
- Incorrect Cause/Effect
- Hidden Premise
- Overgeneralization
The source has many more detailed labels, some of which are variants, compound labels or question-specific explanations.
Do not automatically treat every unique source string as a new canonical mistake type.
Keep raw mistake strings and map them gradually into stable families.
The mistake taxonomy is important for:
- Option elimination
- Distractor design
- Student error analysis
- Pulse/Mocky weakness reporting
- Rav Singh AI recommendations
11. LOGIC / DILR UNIVERSE
11.1 Historical source
Historical coverage:
CAT 2017–2025
558 question records
Original fields:
- Year
- Slot
- Q No.
- Content
- Question Type
- Question Pattern
- Sub Section
- G Strategy
Retain both:
- Broad DILR Sub Section
- Specific G Strategy
Broad historical split
| Source Sub Section | Questions | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Arrangement | 262 | 46.95% |
| Calculations | 296 | 53.05% |
| Total | 558 | 100% |
These historical labels are not identical to the four promoted DILR types.
12. FOUR MAIN CETKING DILR TYPES
Exactly four types are currently promoted.
Type 1 — Arrangement
Includes:
- Wide Wordy
- Wide Numbers
- Teeny Wordy
- Teeny Numbers
Type 2 — Caselet
Includes:
- Classification Caselets
- Calculation Caselets
Type 3 — Graphs
Includes:
- Traditional Graphs
- Tables & Fill in the blanks
- Advanced Graphs
- Venn
The original categories Venn and Venn Diagrams have been combined into the canonical Venn.
Venn belongs under Graphs, not Unassigned.
Type 4 — Schedule & Routing
Includes:
- Routes & Maps
- Scheduling
Use exactly these four Type names in the student-facing and management-facing taxonomy.
13. DILR G STRATEGY HISTORICAL DISTRIBUTION
| Canonical G Strategy | Questions |
|---|---|
| Calculation Caselets | 121 |
| Routes & Maps | 65 |
| Classification Caselets | 61 |
| Wide Numbers | 60 |
| Scheduling | 50 |
| Traditional Graphs | 43 |
| Wide Wordy | 34 |
| Teeny Numbers | 33 |
| Venn | 27 |
| Tables & Fill in the blanks | 24 |
| Advanced Graphs | 20 |
| Teeny Wordy | 20 |
| Total | 558 |
Type-level distribution
| DILR Type | Questions | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Arrangement | 147 | 26.3% |
| Caselet | 182 | 32.6% |
| Graphs | 114 | 20.4% |
| Schedule & Routing | 115 | 20.6% |
| Total | 558 | 100% |
All 558 source records are assigned to one of these four Types in the summary mapping.
Year-wise question volume
| Year | Question records |
|---|---|
| 2017 | 66 |
| 2018 | 64 |
| 2019 | 64 |
| 2020 | 48 |
| 2021 | 64 |
| 2022 | 60 |
| 2023 | 60 |
| 2024 | 66 |
| 2025 | 66 |
| Total | 558 |
These are the counts in Cetking's uploaded DILR research dataset. They must not be mistaken for verified complete official CAT section totals for every year and slot.
14. DILR QUESTION TYPE AND QUESTION PATTERN
The uploaded source contains both:
Question Type
and
Question Pattern
These are distinct labels.
Some source patterns include:
- Fixed-Answer Deductions
- Identification / Classification
- Counting Valid Configurations
- Calculation Deductions
- Optimization
- Yes/No or Determinability Checks
- Comparison / Ranking
- Matrix Grid Filling
- Scheduling Matrix
- Group Distribution
- Venn Diagrams
- Range / Possibility
- Necessarily True / False
Many rows also contain highly specific descriptions rather than reusable taxonomy labels.
Canonicalization rule
Preserve the exact original pattern.
Separately add a standardized question-pattern classification.
Avoid turning hundreds of one-off descriptions into hundreds of official category IDs.
Set-based rule
One DILR passage/set can contain several linked questions.
The structure must support:
Set ID → Shared Context → Question IDs
All questions in the set should inherit the shared context without duplicating it in every question stem.
Each question still has its own Question ID and answer.
15. SUPABASE — QUESTION FACTORY
Cetking Learn project previously used:
suqcijtpfeaystltekfn
Always verify that the connected project is the intended one before any mutation.
Canonical Question Factory tables
| Table | Role |
|---|---|
public.question_bank |
Canonical master questions |
public.question_taxonomy |
Approved taxonomy |
public.question_review_queue |
Staging and review |
public.question_reviews |
Review activity |
public.question_playbooks |
Concepts, formulas, strategies, teaching methods |
public.question_exam_map |
Exam relationships |
public.question_usage |
Where questions are used |
public.tests |
Published assessments |
public.questions |
Questions placed in tests |
public.test_taxonomy |
Valid test taxonomy |
public.question_error_reports |
Mistake/error reports |
Do not assume every planned Question Bank attribute has already been added as a physical column. Inspect the current schema before writing SQL.
The live question_bank includes fields for:
idquestion_codeversionstatustaxonomy_iddifficulty_leveldifficulty_dnasecondary_skillsquestion_typequestion_textoption_athroughoption_dcorrect_optioncorrect_answeranswer_typeoption_mistakessolutionshortcut_solutionconcept_reveal- formula information
solution_methodmedia_assets- source exam/year/slot/reference
is_verbatim_pyq- review and audit metadata
master_quant_core_type_id
Check the actual schema before assuming option_e exists on the canonical bank.
16. QUANT CAT PYQ / 3D SUPABASE TABLES
Created structures include:
public.g_strategy_catalogpublic.cat_pyq_import_batchespublic.cat_pyq_3d_questionspublic.cat_pyq_concept_links
The dedicated 3D table includes fields such as:
idpyq_codesource_examsource_yearsource_year_labelsource_slotsource_srsectionquestion_fullsource_g_strategy_labelg_strategy_statusg_strategy_familyg_strategy_idsource_sub_sectionprimary_topicprimary_sub_topicdimension_typesource_statuslinked_question_bank_idraw_sourceimport_batch_idcreated_atupdated_at
Important live-state warning
The 330-row QAall source was extracted and a CSV/SQL loader prepared.
The dedicated cat_pyq_3d_questions table was verified to contain 0 rows on 8 October 2026.
Do not tell the user that the 330 full questions are imported until the row load and verification actually occur.
17. QUANT SUMMARY TABLES
Current Supabase summary structures include:
public.cat_pyq_summary_sub_section_importancepublic.cat_pyq_summary_g_strategy_importancepublic.cat_pyq_summary_topic_importance
They represent historical analytical pivots.
The website should be able to show:
Sub Section → Year → Count → Importance
G Strategy → Year → Count → Importance
Topic → Year → Count → Importance
Historical summary data can exist before the full underlying PYQ row import.
Do not imply summaries are dynamically generated from live raw rows unless they actually are.
18. VERBAL SUPABASE STRUCTURE
Relevant tables include:
public.cat_verbal_pyq_questionspublic.cat_verbal_pyq_import_batchespublic.cat_verbal_summary_rc_non_importancepublic.cat_verbal_summary_g_strategy_question_importancepublic.cat_verbal_summary_essay_type_importancepublic.cat_verbal_summary_reading_ease_importancepublic.cat_verbal_summary_rc_cr_importancepublic.cat_verbal_summary_except_importancepublic.cat_verbal_summary_mistake_type_importance
Promoted four-section architecture:
public.cat_verbal_g_strategy_section_catalogpublic.cat_verbal_paper_pattern_cleanpublic.cat_verbal_summary_section_yearpublic.cat_verbal_summary_section_slot
Verified section labels
- Summary
- Paragraph
- Evidence
- Critical Reasoning
The internal Evidence code is currently:
PASSAGE_EVIDENCE
This is okay. The visible label is Evidence.
Important live-state warning
As of the latest verification:
public.cat_verbal_pyq_questions = 0 rows
The Verbal historical statistics and summaries were loaded separately.
The original 506-row dataset has not yet been fully imported into the dedicated raw question table.
19. DILR SUPABASE STRUCTURE
Relevant tables:
public.cat_dilr_pyq_import_batchespublic.cat_dilr_summary_sub_section_importancepublic.cat_dilr_summary_g_strategy_importancepublic.cat_dilr_summary_sub_section_yearpublic.cat_dilr_summary_sub_section_slotpublic.cat_dilr_summary_g_strategy_yearpublic.cat_dilr_summary_g_strategy_slotpublic.cat_dilr_type_catalogpublic.cat_dilr_strategy_type_map
Summary views:
public.cat_dilr_summary_strategy_year_pivotpublic.cat_dilr_summary_type_year_pivot
The strategy-year pivot conceptually returns:
DILR Type | Sub Section | G Strategy | 2017 | 2018 | ... | 2025 | Grand Total
The type-year pivot returns:
DILR Type | 2017 | 2018 | ... | 2025 | Grand Total
Verified mapping state
12 canonical G Strategies are mapped into four Types.
Venn includes the former Venn Diagrams historical label.
Venn → GRAPHS
No source strategy remains unassigned in the current 4-Type mapping.
The DILR year-wise G Strategy summaries sum to 558 question records.
20. DIFFICULTY SYSTEM / QUESTION DNA
Cetking uses a structured Question Factory system.
Level 0
Foundation, pre-formula, extremely easy.
Often avoids technical jargon.
Easy
Four DNA variations:
- E1 — Direct Formula
- E2 — Reverse Formula
- E3 — One Missing/Changed Piece
- E4 — Simple Context
Medium
Five DNA variations:
- M1–M5
These represent distinct medium-level constructions, calculation or language complexity, and combinations of core ideas.
Do not invent an exact formal name for each M1–M5 cell unless supported by the topic's approved DNA specification.
Hard
Five DNA variations:
- H1–H5
Hard items should reflect genuine examination-level reasoning and complexity.
Actual CAT PYQs are preferred reference material for harder constructions.
Important
3D is a concept-combination classification, not automatically a numeric difficulty.
A hybrid CAT question can be difficult, but 3D and Hard must remain separate attributes.
21. QUANT CORE-TYPE BANK EXAMPLE — AVERAGES
Averages One is a mature example of the Question Factory architecture.
Three teaching engines
READ THE TOTAL
- Basic Average
- Find Missing Value
- Consecutive Midpoint
- Find Number of Observations
- Required Average
MIX TOTALS
- Pairwise A-B-C
- Combined Average
- Weighted Average
- Overlapping Average
- Reverse Combined
REPAIR THE TOTAL
- Addition
- Removal
- Replacement
- Wrong Entry / Correction
- Group Transfer / Uniform Shift
Teaching principle
Total = Average × Count
Change in Total = Count × Change in Average
Student script:
“Turn average into total. Read/Mix/Repair total. Divide once.”
Canonical bank size
15 Core Types × 14 Difficulty DNA exam cells = 210
Plus 15 Level-0 questions = 225 total canonical Averages questions.
Do not repeat the earlier incorrect figure of 240.
Content surfaces
- Class and handout
- Video/PPT
- Book
- Arena
- Mocks
- PYQ
- Playbooks/Cheatsheets
Level 0 and Easy can be emphasized in Arena.
Books emphasize Medium and Hard.
22. QUESTION CREATION WORKFLOW
Use this pipeline:
Source Collection → Classification → Core Type Review → Difficulty DNA → Question Creation → Independent Solving → Verification → Staging → Approval → Publishing
Source collection
Import actual CAT/CET/XAT/NMAT/SNAP/CMAT questions while retaining source metadata.
Classification
Use the approved topic and core-type taxonomy.
Core Type review
Identify redundant or excessively fragmented types.
Merge only with deliberate approval.
Creation
Generate questions in the approved DNA cells.
Verification
Independently solve each question.
Check:
- Valid stem
- Unique answer or valid TITA
- Correct options
- Correct answer key
- Correct explanation
- No contradiction
- No missing information
- Correct difficulty
- Correct topic/core-type mapping
- Appropriate G Strategy tag
Staging
Stage in review structures.
Approval
A reviewer approves the question.
Publishing
Only approved questions move into student-facing tests/mocks.
AI-generated corrections should not silently modify published questions.
23. QUESTIONS UNIVERSE VS G STRATEGY UNIVERSE
Questions Universe owns
- Permanent Question ID
- Stem
- Options
- Answer
- Normal solution
- Difficulty
- Topic/core-type links
- Source/PYQ identity
G Strategy Universe owns
- Permanent Strategy ID
- Branded method
- Teaching explanation
- Shortcut
- Applicability rules
- Examples
- Links to related questions
A question can use more than one strategy.
A strategy can solve multiple questions.
Do not interpret every broad teaching label as a mathematically verified shortcut.
And always respect:
Concepts No Shortcut → Normal solution only.
24. CONTENT DISTRIBUTION ACROSS MOCKY
Questions Universe provides approved questions.
Mocky delivers:
- Topic Tests
- Sectional Tests
- Full Mocks
- PYQ practice
- Drills
- Arena Fights
- Marathon
Mocky records:
- Student Permanent ID
- Assessment ID
- Question ID
- Attempts
- Score
- Correct/Wrong
- Accuracy
- Time
- Percentile
- Section/Topic mastery
- Benchmark
- Combat result
Mocky does not become the master owner of canonical question content.
Cetking Bank handles reward transactions independently.
25. CAT 2026 EXPECTED PAPER — WORKING BLUEPRINT
Total: 68 Questions
| Section | Predicted questions |
|---|---|
| Verbal | 24 |
| DILR | 22 |
| Quant | 22 |
| Total | 68 |
This is a Cetking prediction, not an official fixed 2026 blueprint.
Verbal — 24 Questions
Structural prediction:
16 RC + 8 Non-RC
Non-RC
- Summary — 2
- Jumbled — 2
- Odd Man Out — 2
- Completion — 2
RC
- 4 passages × 4 questions
Detailed working category mix:
| Section | Question Type | Expected |
|---|---|---|
| Summary | Summary | 2 |
| Summary | TSPM | 2 |
| Paragraph | Jumbled | 2 |
| Paragraph | Odd Man Out | 2 |
| Paragraph | Completion | 2 |
| Evidence | Why Mention This | 4 |
| Evidence | Truth Facts | 2 |
| Critical Reasoning | Inference | 3 |
| Critical Reasoning | Weaken Strengthening | 2 |
| Critical Reasoning | Cause Effect Reasoning | 2 |
| Critical Reasoning | Similarity | 1 |
Grouped:
- Summary: 4
- Paragraph: 6
- Evidence: 6
- Critical Reasoning: 8
Total: 24
This detailed classification is a planning template, not a hard prediction of each exact question type.
DILR — 22 Questions
Working estimate:
5 sets = 3 sets of 4 + 2 sets of 5
| Type | Expected sets | Questions |
|---|---|---|
| Arrangement | 1 | 5 |
| Caselet | 2 | 8 |
| Graphs | 1 | 4 |
| Schedule & Routing | 1 | 5 |
| Total | 5 | 22 |
This is an illustrative set allocation consistent with our historical categories.
Quant — 22 Questions
| Source Sub Section | Predicted |
|---|---|
| Arithmetic | 6 |
| Modern Maths | 5 |
| Algebra | 4 |
| Geo Mensu | 3 |
| TS&W | 2 |
| Numbers | 2 |
| Total | 22 |
All forecasts should be revisited when reliable official information becomes available.
26. WEBSITE PRESENTATION
The CAT PYQ site should support:
Year-wise
CAT → 2025 → Slot 1 → Quant/Verbal/DILR
Topic-wise
Section → Sub Section → Topic → Relevant PYQs
G Strategy-wise
Strategy → Questions using that strategy
3D CAT Questions
Hybrid questions with:
- Historical identity
- Primary topic
- Linked prerequisite concepts
- Strategy tag
- Normal solution
- Shortcut solution if present
- Similar questions
Practice mode
Opening a practice attempt should use Mocky.
Attempts and performance must not be stored back into the Question Factory content tables as if they are question attributes.
27. DATA QUALITY RULES
- Never fabricate missing options, diagrams, stems or solutions.
- Preserve original raw source data.
- Never infer an original CAT question number solely from spreadsheet serial number.
- Never mark an adapted question as verbatim PYQ.
- Never force a 3D question into one exclusive concept.
- Never call
Concepts No Shortcuta G Strategy. - Never rename
X MarotoX Marco. - Use
Evidenceas the Verbal visible label. - Keep
Vennunder Graphs. - Preserve source labels even when canonical labels are normalized.
- Every question needs a permanent canonical ID.
- Reviews must precede publishing.
- Do not create duplicate canonical questions just because the content appears in several mocks or books.
- Treat summary counts as snapshots until corresponding raw data has been loaded and reconciled.
- Verify actual Supabase schemas and row counts before implementing changes.
28. IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES
Priority 1 — Complete raw CAT PYQ imports
Quant:
- 330 source rows
- Populate dedicated 3D CAT PYQ records
- Link canonical question IDs after matching
Verbal:
- 506 source rows
- Populate dedicated Verbal PYQ records
- Preserve passage/set links, question strategy and mistake type
DILR:
- 558 source rows
- Build/complete raw DILR PYQ records
- Preserve set identity and linked questions
Priority 2 — Link historical indexes to Questions Universe
Match/verify:
- Question text
- CAT year
- Slot
- Source reference
- Topic
- G Strategy
Priority 3 — Complete 3D concept linking
Allow multiple prerequisite Core Type IDs per hybrid question.
Priority 4 — Normalize G Strategy mappings
Quant:
- Breakup
- X Maro
- Visual
- Vedic
- Topic-specific strategies pending classification
Verbal:
- Summary
- Paragraph
- Evidence
- Critical Reasoning
DILR:
- Arrangement
- Caselet
- Graphs
- Schedule & Routing
Priority 5 — Publish website views
- CAT year-wise PYQs
- Topic-wise PYQs
- G Strategy-wise PYQs
- 3D CAT-level questions
- Practice mode through Mocky
29. FINAL INSTRUCTIONS TO CLAUDE
You are working with Cetking's real question-production architecture, not a generic examination-question dataset.
Always distinguish:
Historical source versus canonical question.
Question taxonomy versus solving strategy.
Normal question versus 3D hybrid question.
Content database versus student performance system.
Database table existence versus actual loaded records.
Use existing permanent IDs and controlled database relationships.
Do not invent missing data, strategies, question classifications or Supabase columns.
Do not create new categories when existing Cetking labels already cover the concept.
Before proposing a migration, inspect the relevant schema and check existing records.
Before publishing, independently solve and verify content.
The long-term goal is one connected Cetking Questions Universe supporting classes, books, Arena, Mocky, CAT PYQs, G Strategies, Pulse and Rav Singh AI.
END OF CETKING CONTENT UNIVERSES MASTER MEMORY — VERSION 2.0